The testpmd application aim is for testing;
so order of operations should not be enforced.

There was a test to forbid detaching before closing a port.
However, it may interesting to test what happens in such case.
It is possible for a PMD to automatically close the port when detaching.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>
---
 app/test-pmd/testpmd.c | 22 ++++------------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
index 5dbbf783f..f5dee1d71 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
@@ -1938,18 +1938,6 @@ port_is_started(portid_t port_id)
        return 1;
 }
 
-static int
-port_is_closed(portid_t port_id)
-{
-       if (port_id_is_invalid(port_id, ENABLED_WARN))
-               return 0;
-
-       if (ports[port_id].port_status != RTE_PORT_CLOSED)
-               return 0;
-
-       return 1;
-}
-
 int
 start_port(portid_t pid)
 {
@@ -2319,14 +2307,12 @@ detach_port(portid_t port_id)
 
        printf("Detaching a port...\n");
 
-       if (!port_is_closed(port_id)) {
-               printf("Please close port first\n");
-               return;
+       if (ports[port_id].port_status != RTE_PORT_CLOSED) {
+               printf("Port not closed\n");
+               if (ports[port_id].flow_list)
+                       port_flow_flush(port_id);
        }
 
-       if (ports[port_id].flow_list)
-               port_flow_flush(port_id);
-
        if (rte_eth_dev_detach(port_id, name)) {
                TESTPMD_LOG(ERR, "Failed to detach port %u\n", port_id);
                return;
-- 
2.19.0

Reply via email to