On Mon, 2018-10-01 at 12:06 +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: > On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 12:42:09PM +0200, Timothy Redaelli wrote: > > On Mon, 01 Oct 2018 10:46:02 +0100 > > Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 2018-10-01 at 10:25 +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 10:17:14AM +0100, Bruce Richardson > > > > wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 06:58:03PM +0100, Luca Boccassi > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Allow users and packagers to override the default > > > > > > dpdk/drivers > > > > > > subdirectory where the PMDs get installed under $lib. > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org> > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > > I'm ok with this change, but what is the current location > > > > > used by > > > > > distro's > > > > > right now? I mistakenly never checked what was done before I > > > > > used > > > > > dpdk/drivers as a default value, and I'd like the default to > > > > > match > > > > > the > > > > > common option if possible. > > > > > > > > > > /Bruce > > > > > > > > > > > > > Replying to my own question, I've just checked on CentOS and > > > > Debian, > > > > and it > > > > appears both are using directory "dpdk-pmds" as the subdir > > > > name. > > > > Therefore, > > > > let's just make that the default. [Does it need to be > > > > configurable in > > > > that > > > > case?] > > > > > > > > /Bruce > > > > > > If the default is the one I expect then I'm fine without having > > > an > > > option (actually happier - less things to configure). > > > > > > But in Debian/Ubuntu it's dpdk-MAJORVER-drivers since last > > > January :-) > > > We changed because using a single directory creates problems when > > > multiple different ABI versions are installed, due to the EAL > > > autoload > > > from that directory. So we need a different subdirectory per ABI > > > revision. > > > > > > We were actually talking with Timothy a while ago to make this > > > consistent across our distros, and perhaps Marco can chip in as > > > well. > > > > > > Timothy, Marco, is using dpdk-MAJORVER-$something ok for you? I'm > > > not > > > too fussy on $something, it can be drivers or pmds or something > > > else. > > > > > > > LGTM. > > If needed, we can just do a compatibility symlink using the current > > dpdk-pmds path > > > > One suggestion/comment. Would using a unique directory per release > not lead > to clobbering up the lib directory unnecessarily? How about having a > single > "dpdk" or "dpdk-pmds" directory in lib, and having $MAJORVER as a > subdir > under that? > > E.g. dpdk/pmds-18.08/, dpdk/pmds-18.11/, or dpdk-pmds/18.08/ > dpdk-pmds/18.11 > > [The former of the above would be my preference, since I don't like > having > hypenated names, and like having "dpdk" alone as a folder name :-)] > > /Bruce
dpdk/pmds-XX.YY/ would work for me. Timothy and Marco? -- Kind regards, Luca Boccassi
