+Justin He

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gavin Hu <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2018 4:17 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China) <[email protected]>; Honnappa
> Nagarahalli <[email protected]>; Steve Capper
> <[email protected]>; Ola Liljedahl <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]; nd <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> Subject: [PATCH v3 1/3] ring: read tail using atomic load
> 
> In update_tail, read ht->tail using __atomic_load.Although the compiler
> currently seems to be doing the right thing even without _atomic_load, we
> don't want to give the compiler freedom to optimise what should be an
> atomic load, it should not be arbitarily moved around.
> 
> Fixes: 39368ebfc6 ("ring: introduce C11 memory model barrier option")
> Cc: [email protected]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Hu <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Steve Capper <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Ola Liljedahl <[email protected]>
> ---
>  lib/librte_ring/rte_ring_c11_mem.h | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring_c11_mem.h
> b/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring_c11_mem.h
> index 94df3c4..234fea0 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring_c11_mem.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring_c11_mem.h
> @@ -21,7 +21,8 @@ update_tail(struct rte_ring_headtail *ht, uint32_t
> old_val, uint32_t new_val,
>        * we need to wait for them to complete
>        */
>       if (!single)
> -             while (unlikely(ht->tail != old_val))
> +             while (unlikely(old_val != __atomic_load_n(&ht->tail,
> +                                             __ATOMIC_RELAXED)))
>                       rte_pause();
> 
>       __atomic_store_n(&ht->tail, new_val, __ATOMIC_RELEASE);
> --
> 2.7.4

Reply via email to