Great, thank you very much. I'll push the release later tonight.
On Wed, 2018-08-29 at 15:28 +0200, Marco Varlese wrote: > Hi Luca & all, > > I confirm tests carried out via test_pmd and Ovs-DPDK do not show any > regression > for us. > > > Cheers, > Marco > > On Wed, 2018-08-29 at 10:55 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > On Mon, 2018-08-27 at 17:17 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > On Thu, 2018-08-23 at 09:55 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2018-08-13 at 19:21 +0100, luca.bocca...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > Here is a list of patches targeted for LTS release 16.11.8. > > > > > Please > > > > > help review and test. The planned date for the final release > > > > > is > > > > > August > > > > > the 23rd. > > > > > Before that, please shout if anyone has objections with these > > > > > patches being applied. > > > > > > > > > > Also for the companies committed to running regression tests, > > > > > please run the tests and report any issue before the release > > > > > date. > > > > > > > > > > A release candidate tarball can be found at: > > > > > > > > > > https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/tag/?id=v16.11.8-rc1 > > > > > > > > > > These patches are located at branch 16.11 of dpdk-stable > > > > > repo: > > > > > https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/ > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > Luca Boccassi > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Regression tests from Intel have highlighted a possible issue > > > > with > > > > the > > > > changes (unidentified as of now), so while investigation is in > > > > progress > > > > we decided to postpone the release to Monday the 27th to be on > > > > the > > > > safe > > > > side. > > > > Apologies for any issues this might cause. > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Unfortunately triaging is still in progress, so it's better to > > > postpone > > > again, to Wednesday the 29th of August. > > > Apologies again for any issues due to this delay. > > > > Hello all, > > > > I've pushed an -rc2 with the following additional changes: > > > > Luca Boccassi (1): > > Revert "net/i40e: fix packet count for PF" > > > > Radu Nicolau (3): > > net/null: add MAC address setting fake operation > > test/virtual_pmd: add MAC address setting fake op > > test/bonding: assign non-zero MAC to null devices > > > > Radu, I cherry-picked the following 3 patches that you got merged > > in > > 18.02 as they are necessary to fix bonding regression tests from > > Intel: > > > > c5ac7748fd6bfd86b6fb4432b6792733cf32c94c > > c23fc36284e26fca9b52641118ad76a4da99d7af > > e8df563bac263e55b7dd9d45a00417aa92ef66cb > > > > Qi, I have reverted the following patch that was backported to > > 16.11.4 > > as it breaks a Fortville regression test from Intel: > > > > 4bf705a7d74b0b4c1d82ad0821c43e32be15a5e5. > > > > Marco, is there any chance you've got time today to re-run your > > tests? > > These changes in rc2 have been blessed by Intel and AT&T, so if it > > works for you as well I can then release later tonight. > > > > A release candidate tarball can be found at: > > > > https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/tag/?id=v16.11.8-rc2 > > > > These patches are located at branch 16.11 of dpdk-stable repo: > > https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/ > > > > Thanks! > > -- Kind regards, Luca Boccassi
