Hi Luca,
On Wed, 2018-08-29 at 10:55 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > On Mon, 2018-08-27 at 17:17 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > On Thu, 2018-08-23 at 09:55 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > On Mon, 2018-08-13 at 19:21 +0100, luca.bocca...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > Here is a list of patches targeted for LTS release 16.11.8. > > > > Please > > > > help review and test. The planned date for the final release is > > > > August > > > > the 23rd. > > > > Before that, please shout if anyone has objections with these > > > > patches being applied. > > > > > > > > Also for the companies committed to running regression tests, > > > > please run the tests and report any issue before the release > > > > date. > > > > > > > > A release candidate tarball can be found at: > > > > > > > > https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/tag/?id=v16.11.8-rc1 > > > > > > > > These patches are located at branch 16.11 of dpdk-stable repo: > > > > https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/ > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > Luca Boccassi > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Regression tests from Intel have highlighted a possible issue with > > > the > > > changes (unidentified as of now), so while investigation is in > > > progress > > > we decided to postpone the release to Monday the 27th to be on the > > > safe > > > side. > > > Apologies for any issues this might cause. > > > > Hi, > > > > Unfortunately triaging is still in progress, so it's better to > > postpone > > again, to Wednesday the 29th of August. > > Apologies again for any issues due to this delay. > > Hello all, > > I've pushed an -rc2 with the following additional changes: > > Luca Boccassi (1): > Revert "net/i40e: fix packet count for PF" > > Radu Nicolau (3): > net/null: add MAC address setting fake operation > test/virtual_pmd: add MAC address setting fake op > test/bonding: assign non-zero MAC to null devices > > Radu, I cherry-picked the following 3 patches that you got merged in > 18.02 as they are necessary to fix bonding regression tests from Intel: > > c5ac7748fd6bfd86b6fb4432b6792733cf32c94c > c23fc36284e26fca9b52641118ad76a4da99d7af > e8df563bac263e55b7dd9d45a00417aa92ef66cb > > Qi, I have reverted the following patch that was backported to 16.11.4 > as it breaks a Fortville regression test from Intel: > > 4bf705a7d74b0b4c1d82ad0821c43e32be15a5e5. > > Marco, is there any chance you've got time today to re-run your tests? > These changes in rc2 have been blessed by Intel and AT&T, so if it > works for you as well I can then release later tonight. Sure; give me few hours and will let you know how it goes. > > A release candidate tarball can be found at: > > https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/tag/?id=v16.11.8-rc2 > > These patches are located at branch 16.11 of dpdk-stable repo: > https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/ > > Thanks! >
