Hi, Ferruh
What do you think of the patch implementation?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhang, Qi Z
> Sent: Thursday, August 2, 2018 10:28 AM
> To: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zh...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>; sta...@dpdk.org; Zhao1, Wei
> <wei.zh...@intel.com>; Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo...@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ixgbe: remove hardcoded CRC STRIP
> config from ixgbe
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Wei Zhao
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2018 10:37 AM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>; sta...@dpdk.org; Zhao1,
> > Wei <wei.zh...@intel.com>; Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo...@intel.com>
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ixgbe: remove hardcoded CRC STRIP
> > config from ixgbe
> >
> > There is CRC related ifdefs for ixgbe:
> > CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IXGBE_PF_DISABLE_STRIP_CRC=n
> > It is used in VF drivers ixgbevf_dev_configure() functions.
> > VF cannot change the CRC strip behavior and based on what PF
> > configured it needs to response proper to user
> > ixgbevf_dev_configure() request. Right now what PF set is defined by
> > above config options but this method is too static.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Zhao <wei.zh...@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo...@intel.com>
> > ---
> > app/test-pmd/parameters.c | 6 ++++++
> > app/test-pmd/testpmd.c | 2 ++
> > app/test-pmd/testpmd.h | 1 +
> > drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
> > lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h | 1 +
> > 5 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> Its better separate the patch for ethdev, ixgbe, and testpmd.
>