Tuesday, July 31, 2018 10:57 AM, Shahaf Shuler:
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix VLAN filtering
> 
> The below commit has added a graph based expansion logic for RSS rule to
> satisfy Verbs requirements. With this logic, for example, the rule:
> 
> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / end actions rss queues 0 1 end types ipv4-
> tcp ipv6-tcp end / end
> 
> will be expanded into the rules:
> 
> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / tcp / end actions rss queues 0 1 
> end
> types ipv4-tcp ipv6-tcp end / end
> 
> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv6 / tcp / end actions rss queues 0 1 
> end
> types ipv4-tcp ipv6-tcp end / end
> 
> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / end actions queue index 0 / end
> 
> The below commit defined two graphs:
> 1. graph for the tunnel case which starts from the ETH item 2. graph for the
> non-tunnel case which starts from the ETH item
> 
> The graphs are ignoring the VLAN case. Hence rules with VLAN item will fail to
> traverse the graph and it will result in flow rule creation error.
> 
> Adding the VLAN item to the existing graphs will not work as the flow engine
> will reject any VLAN item without a specific vid.
> 
> To solve this case two new graphs were added (for the tunnel and non-
> tunnel case) which contain the VLAN item and are being used only when the
> VLAN item exists in the flow pattern.
> 
> Two cases left un-covered for the inner RSS:
> 1. The case were VLAN exists in the pattern as part of the inner headers 2.
> The case were VLAN exists in the pattern both in the outer and the inner
> headers
> 
> Solving those cases will require to add two more graphs.
> Holding a VLAN for the overlay network is not common, the subnets are
> usually defined by the tunnel protocol, for example the VXLAN vni.
> Hence adding those two graphs seems like an overkill at this point.
> Based on needs one can add those to provide the full support.
> 
> Fixes: 592f05b29a25 ("net/mlx5: add RSS flow action")
> Cc: nelio.laranje...@6wind.com
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shahaf Shuler <shah...@mellanox.com>

Applied to next-net-mlx, thanks. 

Reply via email to