Hi David,

> From: David Marchand [mailto:david.marchand at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2014 7:45 PM
> To: De Lara Guarch, Pablo
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Added functions to get RX/TX default
> configuration
> 
> Hello Pablo,
> - All I can see in this patchset is stuff that should remain in the PMD (since
> this is really specific to them).
> 
> - Anyway, if you want to let application get this information, why the new API
> ?
> From my point of view, this should go in rte_eth_dev_info_get().

Thanks for the comments. Main changes are in the PMDs, and I only added two 
functions in rte_ethdev.c, which basically calls the functions in the PMDs.
Anyway, so you suggest to modify the rte_eth_dev_info structure, so it also 
contains these two structures populated with the default values?

Thanks,
Pablo
> 
> 
> --
> David Marchand
> 
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Pablo de Lara
> <pablo.de.lara.guarch at intel.com> wrote:
> These patches add two new API functions to get an optimal values
> for the RX/TX configuration structures (rte_eth_rxconf and rte_eth_txconf),
> so users can get these configurations and modify or use them directly,
> to set up RX/TX queues. Besides, most of the apps that were modifying little
> or none of the default values of the structures, have been modified to use
> these functions to simplify the code and avoid duplication.
> 
> Pablo de Lara (2):
> ? pmd: Added rte_eth_rxconf_defaults and rte_eth_txconf defaults
> ? ? functions
> ? app: Used rte_eth_rxconf_defaults and rte_eth_txconf_defaults in apps
> 
> ?examples/dpdk_qat/main.c? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?|? ?44 ++-----------
> ?examples/exception_path/main.c? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?|? ?30 +--------
> ?examples/ip_fragmentation/main.c? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?|? ?42 ++-----------
> ?examples/ip_reassembly/main.c? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? |? ?44 ++-----------
> ?examples/ipv4_multicast/main.c? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?|? ?44 ++-----------
> ?examples/kni/main.c? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? |? ?34 +---------
> ?examples/l2fwd-ivshmem/host/host.c? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?|? ?43 +-----------
> ?examples/l2fwd/main.c? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? |? ?48 +-------------
> ?examples/l3fwd-acl/main.c? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? |? ?46 ++------------
> ?examples/l3fwd-power/main.c? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? |? ?46 ++-----------
> ?examples/l3fwd-vf/main.c? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?|? ?31 ++-------
> ?examples/l3fwd/main.c? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? |? ?54 +++-------------
> ?examples/link_status_interrupt/main.c? ? ? ? ? ? ? |? ?43 +-----------
> ?examples/load_balancer/init.c? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? |? ?24 +------
> ?.../client_server_mp/mp_server/init.c? ? ? ? ? ? ? |? ?41 +-----------
> ?examples/multi_process/l2fwd_fork/main.c? ? ? ? ? ?|? ?44 +------------
> ?examples/multi_process/symmetric_mp/main.c? ? ? ? ?|? ?36 +---------
> ?examples/netmap_compat/bridge/bridge.c? ? ? ? ? ? ?|? ?25 -------
> ?examples/netmap_compat/lib/compat_netmap.c? ? ? ? ?|? ? 6 +-
> ?examples/netmap_compat/lib/compat_netmap.h? ? ? ? ?|? ? 2 -
> ?examples/qos_meter/main.c? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? |? ?36 ++++-------
> ?examples/quota_watermark/qw/init.c? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?|? ?26 ++------
> ?examples/vhost_xen/main.c? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? |? ?31 ++-------
> ?examples/vmdq/main.c? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?|? ?60 ++---------------
> ?examples/vmdq_dcb/main.c? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?|? ?36 +---------
> ?lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? |? ?68 
> ++++++++++++++++++++
> ?lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? |? ?29 ++++++++
> ?lib/librte_pmd_e1000/igb_ethdev.c? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? |? ?56 ++++++++++++++++-
> ?lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_ethdev.c? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? |? ?56 ++++++++++++++++
> ?lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? |? ?59 +++++++++++++++++
> ?30 files changed, 385 insertions(+), 799 deletions(-)
> 
> --
> 1.7.7.6

Reply via email to