On 5/25/2018 10:08 AM, Zhang, Qi Z wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Yigit, Ferruh
>> Sent: Friday, May 25, 2018 4:35 PM
>> To: Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zh...@intel.com>; Thomas Monjalon
>> <tho...@monjalon.net>; Varghese, Vipin <vipin.vargh...@intel.com>
>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Kovacevic, Marko <marko.kovace...@intel.com>; Jain,
>> Deepak K <deepak.k.j...@intel.com>
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc/eth: update document for functional
>> limitation
>>
>> On 5/25/2018 1:44 AM, Zhang, Qi Z wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
>>>> Sent: Friday, May 25, 2018 1:06 AM
>>>> To: Varghese, Vipin <vipin.vargh...@intel.com>
>>>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zh...@intel.com>; Kovacevic,
>>>> Marko <marko.kovace...@intel.com>; Jain, Deepak K
>>>> <deepak.k.j...@intel.com>; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>
>>>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc/eth: update document for
>>>> functional limitation
>>>>
>>>> 23/05/2018 12:05, Vipin Varghese:
>>>>> --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
>>>>> +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
>>>>> @@ -1479,6 +1479,9 @@ int rte_eth_dev_attach(const char *devargs,
>>>> uint16_t *port_id);
>>>>> * This function must be called when the device is in the
>>>>> * closed state.
>>>>> *
>>>>> + * Note:
>>>>> + * - Currently supported for primary process only.
>>>>
>>>> I think it should be possible to attach a device in secondary process.
>>>> If it is a recent limitation, it should be in "known issues" of the release
>> notes.
>>>
>>> For PCI device, we can only attached a device that is already resource
>>> mapped in primary process (for example, a device not in secondary process'
>> white list but in primary process's) And we should not detached a device in
>> secondary process, that will mess primary process and cause it can't be
>> attached again.
>>>
>>> For vdev, I think we still can attached/detach a new device which does not
>> exist in primary process.
>>
>> For vdev it was possible to attach a new device in secondary, but it seems
>> primary process checks has been added to virtual PMDs probe() function by [1]
>> which seems breaking this capability, can you please check it?
>
> Yes, attach vdev "net_af_packet,iface=eth0" on secondary process will create
> a private device.
Yep, Qi kindly explained me that it is still possible create vdevs using
rte_eth_dev_attach() on secondary process.
So this patch is not exactly correct.
>>
>>
>> [1]
>> Fixes: ee27edbe0c10 ("drivers/net: share vdev data to secondary process")
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
