> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yigit, Ferruh
> Sent: Friday, May 25, 2018 4:35 PM
> To: Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zh...@intel.com>; Thomas Monjalon
> <tho...@monjalon.net>; Varghese, Vipin <vipin.vargh...@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Kovacevic, Marko <marko.kovace...@intel.com>; Jain,
> Deepak K <deepak.k.j...@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc/eth: update document for functional
> limitation
>
> On 5/25/2018 1:44 AM, Zhang, Qi Z wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
> >> Sent: Friday, May 25, 2018 1:06 AM
> >> To: Varghese, Vipin <vipin.vargh...@intel.com>
> >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zh...@intel.com>; Kovacevic,
> >> Marko <marko.kovace...@intel.com>; Jain, Deepak K
> >> <deepak.k.j...@intel.com>; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc/eth: update document for
> >> functional limitation
> >>
> >> 23/05/2018 12:05, Vipin Varghese:
> >>> --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
> >>> +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
> >>> @@ -1479,6 +1479,9 @@ int rte_eth_dev_attach(const char *devargs,
> >> uint16_t *port_id);
> >>> * This function must be called when the device is in the
> >>> * closed state.
> >>> *
> >>> + * Note:
> >>> + * - Currently supported for primary process only.
> >>
> >> I think it should be possible to attach a device in secondary process.
> >> If it is a recent limitation, it should be in "known issues" of the release
> notes.
> >
> > For PCI device, we can only attached a device that is already resource
> > mapped in primary process (for example, a device not in secondary process'
> white list but in primary process's) And we should not detached a device in
> secondary process, that will mess primary process and cause it can't be
> attached again.
> >
> > For vdev, I think we still can attached/detach a new device which does not
> exist in primary process.
>
> For vdev it was possible to attach a new device in secondary, but it seems
> primary process checks has been added to virtual PMDs probe() function by [1]
> which seems breaking this capability, can you please check it?
Yes, attach vdev "net_af_packet,iface=eth0" on secondary process will create a
private device.
>
>
> [1]
> Fixes: ee27edbe0c10 ("drivers/net: share vdev data to secondary process")
>
> >
> >>
> >>
> >
