On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 08:35:21PM +0800, Andy Green wrote:
> 
> 
> On 05/17/2018 06:36 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 01:09:32PM +0800, Andy Green wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Andy Green <a...@warmcat.com>
> > > ---
> > >   lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_string_fns.c  |   34 
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >   lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_string_fns.h |    7 +----
> > >   2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > 
> > While I'm aware this was suggested by other reviewers, I really don't feel
> > that it is necessary to actually import the code. If libbsd is present on
> > the system, we will use it directly. If libbsd is not present, the snprintf
> > provides an acceptable fallback for strlcpy IMHO. Having the full function
> > without good justification seems excessive.
> 
> Well, as you can probably guess, I don't really mind either way.
> 
> This also implies another patch to export rte_strlcpy since it's no longer
> an inline in the headers this way.
> 
> I removed these patches and rebuilt dpdk and then lagopus without it with
> the idea of pasting the compile error.  But I can't reproduce the original
> problem... since then I rebased on current master dpdk, got updated to gcc
> 8.1 and added more patches on lagopus.
> 
> So just drop this patch if you don't want the bsd lstrcpy.
> 
Yes, let's drop it from the set for now anyway, if it's not solving any
specific error. We can relook at it in 18.08 anyway.

/Bruce

Reply via email to