Hi Adrien,
<snip>
> > > Subject: [PATCH] maintainers: fix responsibility of flow API bits
> > >
> > > The following commits lack MAINTAINERS entries for this mess.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 4d73b6fb9907 ("doc: add generic flow API guide")
> > > Fixes: 19c90af6285c ("app/testpmd: add flow command")
> > > Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarg...@6wind.com>
> > > Cc: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremon...@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > MAINTAINERS | 2 ++
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index bd08d4292..187817fff
> > > 100644
> > > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > > @@ -303,6 +303,8 @@ F: devtools/test-null.sh Flow API
> > > M: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarg...@6wind.com>
> > > T: git://dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-net
> > > +F: app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
> > > +F: doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst
> >
> > doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> > Should be added to the list of flow related files.
>
> I did not add it because there is no way to split responsibility on a
> documentation section basis AFAIK, and only a fraction of this file contains
> information about rte_flow-related stuff.
>
> --
> Adrien Mazarguil
> 6WIND
There are already several maintainers for testpmd, adding another maintainer
for the flow parts of this file should be ok (I think).
Regards,
Bernard
