[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 06/11] ethdev: allow ownership operations on unused port

[Thomas Monjalon]

From: Matan Azrad <ma...@mellanox.com>

When the state will be updated later than in allocation,
we may need to update the ownership of a port which is
still in state unused.

It will be used to take ownership of a port before it is
declared as available for other entities.

Cc: sta...@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Matan Azrad <ma...@mellanox.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>
---
 lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c | 23 ++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
index 6071e3a9b..ae86d0ba7 100644
--- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
+++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
@@ -414,10 +414,14 @@ static int
 _rte_eth_dev_owner_set(const uint16_t port_id, const uint64_t old_owner_id,
                       const struct rte_eth_dev_owner *new_owner)
 {
+       struct rte_eth_dev *ethdev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
        struct rte_eth_dev_owner *port_owner;
        int sret;
 
-       RTE_ETH_VALID_PORTID_OR_ERR_RET(port_id, -ENODEV);
+       if (port_id >= RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS || ethdev->data->name[0] == '\0') {
+               RTE_PMD_DEBUG_TRACE("Port id %"PRIu16" is not allocated.\n", 
port_id);
+               return -ENODEV;
+       }
 
        if (!rte_eth_is_valid_owner_id(new_owner->id) &&
            !rte_eth_is_valid_owner_id(old_owner_id))
@@ -481,16 +485,17 @@ rte_eth_dev_owner_unset(const uint16_t port_id, const 
uint64_t owner_id)
 void __rte_experimental
 rte_eth_dev_owner_delete(const uint64_t owner_id)
 {
-       uint16_t port_id;
+       uint32_t port_id;
 
        rte_eth_dev_shared_data_prepare();
 
        rte_spinlock_lock(&rte_eth_dev_shared_data->ownership_lock);
 
        if (rte_eth_is_valid_owner_id(owner_id)) {
-               RTE_ETH_FOREACH_DEV_OWNED_BY(port_id, owner_id)
-                       memset(&rte_eth_devices[port_id].data->owner, 0,
-                              sizeof(struct rte_eth_dev_owner));
+               for (port_id = 0; port_id < RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS; port_id++)
+                       if (rte_eth_devices[port_id].data->owner.id == owner_id)
+                               memset(&rte_eth_devices[port_id].data->owner, 0,
+                                      sizeof(struct rte_eth_dev_owner));
                RTE_PMD_DEBUG_TRACE("All port owners owned by %016"PRIX64
                                " identifier have removed.\n", owner_id);
        }
@@ -502,17 +507,17 @@ int __rte_experimental
 rte_eth_dev_owner_get(const uint16_t port_id, struct rte_eth_dev_owner *owner)
 {
        int ret = 0;
+       struct rte_eth_dev *ethdev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
 
        rte_eth_dev_shared_data_prepare();
 
        rte_spinlock_lock(&rte_eth_dev_shared_data->ownership_lock);
 
-       if (!rte_eth_dev_is_valid_port(port_id)) {
-               RTE_PMD_DEBUG_TRACE("Invalid port_id=%d\n", port_id);
+       if (port_id >= RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS || ethdev->data->name[0] == '\0') {
+               RTE_PMD_DEBUG_TRACE("Port id %"PRIu16" is not allocated.\n", 
port_id);
                ret = -ENODEV;
        } else {
-               rte_memcpy(owner, &rte_eth_devices[port_id].data->owner,
-                          sizeof(*owner));
+               rte_memcpy(owner, &ethdev->data->owner, sizeof(*owner));
        }
 
        rte_spinlock_unlock(&rte_eth_dev_shared_data->ownership_lock);
-- 
2.16.2