-----Original Message-----
> Date: Sun, 6 May 2018 00:17:09 +0530
> From: Abhinandan Gujjar <abhinandan.guj...@intel.com>
> To: jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com, hemant.agra...@nxp.com,
> akhil.go...@nxp.com, dev@dpdk.org
> CC: narender.vang...@intel.com, abhinandan.guj...@intel.com,
> nikhil....@intel.com, gage.e...@intel.com
> Subject: [v3,4/5] test: add event crypto adapter auto-test
> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1
>
> Signed-off-by: Abhinandan Gujjar <abhinandan.guj...@intel.com>
> ---
> +struct event_crypto_adapter_test_params {
> + struct rte_mempool *mbuf_pool;
> + struct rte_mempool *op_mpool;
> + struct rte_mempool *session_mpool;
> + struct rte_cryptodev_config *config;
> + uint8_t crypto_event_port_id;
> +};
> +
> +struct rte_event response_info = {
> + .queue_id = TEST_APP_EV_QUEUE_ID,
> + .sched_type = RTE_SCHED_TYPE_ATOMIC,
> + .flow_id = 0xAABB,
> + .sub_event_type = 0,
> + .event_type = 0,
> + .priority = 0,
> + .impl_opaque = 0
> +};
This may break old compiler.
see http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/39398/
> +
> +struct rte_event_crypto_request request_info = {
> + .cdev_id = TEST_CDEV_ID,
> + .queue_pair_id = TEST_CDEV_QP_ID
> +};
> +
> +static int
> +test_crypto_adapter_stats(void)
> +{
> + struct rte_event_crypto_adapter_stats stats;
> +
> + rte_event_crypto_adapter_stats_get(TEST_ADAPTER_ID, &stats);
> + printf(" +------------------------------------------------------+\n");
> + printf(" + Crypto adapter stats for instance %u:\n", TEST_ADAPTER_ID);
> + printf(" + Event port poll count %lu\n",
> + stats.event_poll_count);
> + printf(" + Event dequeue count %lu\n",
> + stats.event_deq_count);
> + printf(" + Cryptodev enqueue count %lu\n",
> + stats.crypto_enq_count);
> + printf(" + Cryptodev enqueue failed count %lu\n",
> + stats.crypto_enq_fail);
> + printf(" + Cryptodev dequeue count %lu\n",
> + stats.crypto_deq_count);
> + printf(" + Event enqueue count %lu\n",
> + stats.event_enq_count);
> + printf(" + Event enqueue retry count %lu\n",
> + stats.event_enq_retry_count);
> + printf(" + Event enqueue fail count %lu\n",
Use PRIx64 to fix issue with 32b build target.
> + stats.event_enq_fail_count);
> + printf(" +------------------------------------------------------+\n");
> +
> + rte_event_crypto_adapter_stats_reset(TEST_ADAPTER_ID);
> + return TEST_SUCCESS;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +configure_eventdev(void)
> +{
> + const char *eventdev_name = "event_sw0";
> + struct rte_event_queue_conf queue_conf;
> + struct rte_event_dev_config devconf;
> + struct rte_event_dev_info info;
> + uint32_t queue_count;
> + uint32_t port_count;
> + int ret;
> + uint8_t qid;
> +
> + evdev = rte_event_dev_get_dev_id(eventdev_name);
No need to assume it is "event_sw0" driver. You can select 0th event
device for testing. If none of the event device is available then you can
create "event_sw0" with vdev.
> + if (evdev < 0) {
> + if (rte_vdev_init(eventdev_name, NULL) < 0) {
> + RTE_LOG(DEBUG, USER1, "Error creating eventdev\n");
> + return TEST_FAILED;
> + }
> + evdev = rte_event_dev_get_dev_id(eventdev_name);
> + if (evdev < 0) {
> + RTE_LOG(DEBUG, USER1, "Error finding eventdev!\n");
> + return TEST_FAILED;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + ret = rte_event_dev_info_get(evdev, &info);
> + TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(ret, "Failed to get event dev info\n");
> +
> +static struct unit_test_suite service_tests = {
It is not "service_tests". Choose an appropriate name.
