> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 4:02 AM
> To: Liu, Jijiang
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/8]app/test-pmd:test VxLAN packet
> identification
> 
> 2014-10-11 13:55, Jijiang Liu:
> > -                   "tx_checksum set mask (port_id)\n"
> > +                   "tx_checksum set (mask) (port_id)\n"
> >                     "    Enable hardware insertion of checksum offload
> with"
> > -                   " the 4-bit mask, 0~0xf, in packets sent on a port.\n"
> > +                   " the 8-bit mask, 0~0xff, in packets sent on a port.\n"
> >                     "        bit 0 - insert ip   checksum offload if set\n"
> >                     "        bit 1 - insert udp  checksum offload if set\n"
> >                     "        bit 2 - insert tcp  checksum offload if set\n"
> >                     "        bit 3 - insert sctp checksum offload if set\n"
> > +                   "        bit 4 - insert inner ip  checksum offload if
> set\n"
> > +                   "        bit 5 - insert inner udp checksum offload if
> set\n"
> > +                   "        bit 6 - insert inner tcp checksum offload if
> set\n"
> > +                   "        bit 7 - insert inner sctp checksum offload if
> set\n"
> >                     "    Please check the NIC datasheet for HW
> limits.\n\n"
> [...]
> >     .help_str = "enable hardware insertion of L3/L4checksum with a
> given "
> > -   "mask in packets sent on a port, the bit mapping is given as, Bit 0 for
> ip"
> > -   "Bit 1 for UDP, Bit 2 for TCP, Bit 3 for SCTP",
> > +   "mask in packets sent on a port, the bit mapping is given as, Bit 0 for
> ip "
> > +   "Bit 1 for UDP, Bit 2 for TCP, Bit 3 for SCTP, Bit 4 for inner ip "
> > +   "Bit 5 for inner UDP, Bit 6 for inner TCP, Bit 7 for inner SCTP",
> >     .tokens = {
> >             (void *)&cmd_tx_cksum_set_tx_cksum,
> >             (void *)&cmd_tx_cksum_set_set,
> 
> How is it related to VXLAN?
> I may have missed something. But if not, I note the name of the reviewers ;)

Yes, it is related to VxLAN Tx Checksum test, I will put the changes to test 
VxLAN Tx checksum patch.
> --
> Thomas

Reply via email to