Hello Neil, On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Neil Horman <nhorman at tuxdriver.com> wrote: > > Though, that said, why are these files diverged in the first place? At > least as > far as eal_lcore.c and eal.c are concerned the only differences appear to > be > cases of one file being updated and not the other. It seems that, rather > than > doing a patch like this to bring bsd up to date with linux, we should just > de-dup the files, put them in a common location and handle any real > behavioral > differences with macros/ifdefs. Is there a reason for separating them? >
I agree that there should only be one file for those things (and a lot of other stuff like eal_debug, eal_log etc...). This is not that easy: I tried once and gave up because the resulting patchset was huge. Personally, I don't have time to dig into this. -- David Marchand
