> -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 12:41 PM > To: De Lara Guarch, Pablo > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Olivier MATZ; Iremonger, Bernard > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] doc: Corrected info for tx_checksum set > mask function, in testpmd UG > > Hi Pablo, > > 2014-11-17 10:47, De Lara Guarch, Pablo: > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Olivier MATZ > > > On 11/15/2014 08:13 PM, Pablo de Lara wrote: > > > > tx_checksum set mask function now allows 4 extra bits in the mask > > > > for TX checksum offload > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch at intel.com> > > > > --- > > > > doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst | 10 +++++++++- > > > > 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > > > > A patch reworking the csumonly API is pending: > > > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-November/008188.html > > > > > > I don't know if it will be accepted, but just to mention that > > > these 2 patches will conflict in this case. > > > > Thanks for spotting it! I guess that at this point, all we can do is wait. > > If you patch gets applied before mine, I will send a v2 with the changes. > > If it gets applied after, then I will send another patch to fix it. > > Oliver will send a v4 of his TSO patchset which should be applied shortly. > Please could you adjust the documentation and make a v2? > > Bernard, we have to wait for this change.
Sure, no problem. > > Thanks to all > -- > Thomas
