OK thanks. Sorry my bad. -ql On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com > wrote:
> 2014-11-13 08:56, jigsaw: > > >>Do you have another commit before this one in your tree? > > > > Yes this patch relies on this one: > > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-November/007943.html > > > > Sorry I didn't make it clear. The new field usr in rte_mbuf was under > same > > cover letter in v2 of the in_flight_bitmask patch. > > Then in_flight_bitmask has a v3 patch, but I didn't include the rte_mbuf > in > > the same cover letter, coz the usr patch has been ACKed. > > OK. In this case, you should re-submit the whole serie and add the acked-by > line in the patch, and/or use the --in-reply-to option to place the v3 > patch in > the original thread. > > No need to resend it, I can manage to get the whole patchset now. > > Thanks > -- > Thomas >
