2014-11-13 08:56, jigsaw: > >>Do you have another commit before this one in your tree? > > Yes this patch relies on this one: > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-November/007943.html > > Sorry I didn't make it clear. The new field usr in rte_mbuf was under same > cover letter in v2 of the in_flight_bitmask patch. > Then in_flight_bitmask has a v3 patch, but I didn't include the rte_mbuf in > the same cover letter, coz the usr patch has been ACKed.
OK. In this case, you should re-submit the whole serie and add the acked-by line in the patch, and/or use the --in-reply-to option to place the v3 patch in the original thread. No need to resend it, I can manage to get the whole patchset now. Thanks -- Thomas
