On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 08:24:56AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Hi Neil, > > 2014-05-28 10:17, Neil Horman: > > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 02:55:16PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > Some linker options were not prefixed by -Wl, when using gcc: > > > -z muldefs > > > -melf_i386 (32-bit config) > > > > > > Using macro linkerprefix is fixing it. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com> > [...] > > > ifeq ($(LINK_USING_CC),1) > > > # Override the definition of LD here, since we're linking with CC > > > LD := $(CC) > > > > > > +LD_MULDEFS := $(call linkerprefix,-z$(comma)muldefs) > > > +CPU_LDFLAGS := $(call linkerprefix,$(CPU_LDFLAGS)) > > > > Agree with Olivier, what exactly is the problem here? > > When using CC as LD, linker options should be prefixed with -Wl. > > > Also, I don't think > > this is correct, as CPU_LD_FLAGS and -z muldefs below is used in > > conjunction with $LD. It would make sense to prefix -Wl to these options > > if we were passing them through $CC, but not $LD > > Yes, but options are prefixed only in the case LD = CC. > ah, sorry, was looking at the wrong clause in rte.lib.mk
> Neil, this situation is funny as you're the author of the patch making LD as > CC and you submitted this kind of fix to prefix CPU_LDFLAGS :) > This patch is a translation of yours with use of macro linkerprefix. > Yeah, my fault, I was only looking at the lines changed, rather than the context surrounding them. This makes sense. Neil > -- > Thomas >