On 06/25/2014 09:46 AM, Olivier MATZ wrote: > Your patch moves the creation of the ring after the call to > rte_memzone_reserve(), so now it tries to create the memory > for the object pool before the ring. The problem disappears > because the object pool is usually much bigger than the ring, > so once the first allocation is done, the second is unlikely > to fail. > > I think this explanation could be added in the commit log. > > Acked-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz at 6wind.com>
Sorry, I didn't see that Konstantin and Bruce already answered to this.
