> > On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 16:16:02 +0000 > "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev at intel.com> wrote: > > > But now, memzone created for the actual mempool could get leaked instead? > > Since memzone's can't be destroyed, then only solution would be if > checked if memzone with same name already exists.
Actually, wouldn't it be the better way to create one memzone for both mempool and its ring? Now we have rte_ring_init(). Konstantin
