Are you talking about 82599? I have no plan to support this currently. But I don't know there may be volunteers who is planning for it. I guess it also be great if you are eager to contribute to it.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Ilan Borenshtein [mailto:ilan at asocstech.com] > Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 3:17 PM > To: Wu, Jingjing; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function > > Looking for director packet to different queues in a VF. > Will it be implemented in future releases ? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Wu, Jingjing [mailto:jingjing.wu at intel.com] > Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 3:40 AM > To: Ilan Borenshtein; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function > > Could you explain what exactly you want? Director packet to a VF? Or director > packet to > different queue in a VF? > > For the first one, I think if you know which queue the VF is using, the flow > director can do it > (it's my understanding, haven't try). > But for the latter, I have no idea which way can be used instead. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ilan Borenshtein [mailto:ilan at asocstech.com] > > Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2014 3:34 PM > > To: Wu, Jingjing; dev at dpdk.org > > Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function > > > > Hi, > > > > Is there any other way except of the Flow director to use the different Rx > > queues by a VF ? > > Will the next versions support flow director for VF ? > > > > Thanks, > > Ilan B > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Wu, Jingjing [mailto:jingjing.wu at intel.com] > > Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 10:51 AM > > To: Ilan Borenshtein; dev at dpdk.org > > Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function > > > > Hi > > > > Flow director is not supported on VF now. > > I think this may be the reason why ENOTSUP is returned. > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ilan > > > Borenshtein > > > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 8:34 PM > > > To: dev at dpdk.org > > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] Signature filter for virtual function > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I'm trying to configure the flow director of VF 82599 port using > > > rte_eth_dev_fdir_add_signature_filter (). > > > The function returns with ENOTSUP. > > > Doe's flow director supported for VF ? > > > What can be the reason for ENOTSUP ? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Ilan B
