Could you explain what exactly you want? Director packet to a VF? Or director packet to different queue in a VF?
For the first one, I think if you know which queue the VF is using, the flow director can do it (it's my understanding, haven't try). But for the latter, I have no idea which way can be used instead. > -----Original Message----- > From: Ilan Borenshtein [mailto:ilan at asocstech.com] > Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2014 3:34 PM > To: Wu, Jingjing; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function > > Hi, > > Is there any other way except of the Flow director to use the different Rx > queues by a VF ? > Will the next versions support flow director for VF ? > > Thanks, > Ilan B > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Wu, Jingjing [mailto:jingjing.wu at intel.com] > Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 10:51 AM > To: Ilan Borenshtein; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function > > Hi > > Flow director is not supported on VF now. > I think this may be the reason why ENOTSUP is returned. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ilan Borenshtein > > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 8:34 PM > > To: dev at dpdk.org > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] Signature filter for virtual function > > > > Hello, > > > > I'm trying to configure the flow director of VF 82599 port using > > rte_eth_dev_fdir_add_signature_filter (). > > The function returns with ENOTSUP. > > Doe's flow director supported for VF ? > > What can be the reason for ENOTSUP ? > > > > Thanks, > > Ilan B
