Hi Willem:

I have a few questions.
1. Do all contributors need to sign iCLA?
   Currently most Contributors in Doris have not signed iCLA, only Committer or 
PPMC members have signed it.
2. this feature is from a contributor in Meituan, Inc, does it also need IP 
clearance?
    I refer to the instructions here[1]. But didn't find how to start the 
process...
    And it also says: Incubating projects should follow the procedure described 
in the incubator mentor guide and report status via STATUS tracking.
    but still not find the way to start...



[1] https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/




--

此致!Best Regards
陈明雨 Mingyu Chen

Email:
[email protected]





在 2022-02-22 08:47:40,"Willem Jiang" <[email protected]> 写道:
>You can find the IP Clearance guide here[1]
>
>[1]https://incubator.apache.org/guides/ip_clearance.html
>
>Willem Jiang
>
>Twitter: willemjiang
>Weibo: 姜宁willem
>
>On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 8:40 AM Willem Jiang <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Please make sure the contributor signed the CLA.
>> If these test framework is from Baidu, we need to go through the IP 
>> clearance[1]
>>
>> [1]https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/
>>
>> Willem Jiang
>>
>> Twitter: willemjiang
>> Weibo: 姜宁willem
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 11:25 AM ling miao <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > First, we need to open source the P0 test set (From Baidu)~
>> >
>> > Ling Miao
>> >
>> > 924060929 <[email protected]> 于2022年2月19日周六 18:43写道:
>> >
>> > > Thinks for greate&nbsp;suggestions.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > The print result function is missing, and can run&nbsp;parallely
>> > > and&nbsp;randomly.
>> > > But&nbsp;it is easy to implement, I can support in next pull request.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > ------------------&nbsp;原始邮件&nbsp;------------------
>> > > 发件人: "1 0"<[email protected]&gt;;
>> > > 发送时间: 2022年2月19日(星期六) 下午4:30
>> > > 收件人: "dev"<[email protected]&gt;;
>> > > 主题: Re: The new scalable regression testing framework(#8125)
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > It&#39;s&nbsp;a&nbsp;great&nbsp;job.&nbsp;I&nbsp;have&nbsp;a&nbsp;suggestion&nbsp;on&nbsp;writing&nbsp;a&nbsp;case&nbsp;more&nbsp;easily.&nbsp;&nbsp;We
>> > >
>> > > should&nbsp;accept&nbsp;cases&nbsp;in&nbsp;sql&nbsp;and&nbsp;check&nbsp;the&nbsp;result&nbsp;by&nbsp;comparing&nbsp;the&nbsp;content&nbsp;of
>> > >
>> > > stdout&nbsp;and&nbsp;stderr.&nbsp;This&nbsp;way,&nbsp;anyone&nbsp;can&nbsp;contribute&nbsp;a&nbsp;case&nbsp;easily,&nbsp;for
>> > >
>> > > example&nbsp;I&nbsp;just&nbsp;execute&nbsp;sql&nbsp;and&nbsp;put&nbsp;output.&nbsp;The&nbsp;cases&nbsp;can&nbsp;also&nbsp;be&nbsp;used
>> > > easily&nbsp;by&nbsp;other&nbsp;tests&nbsp;like&nbsp;fuzzy.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Can&nbsp;the&nbsp;framework&nbsp;run&nbsp;parallely&nbsp;and&nbsp;randomly?&nbsp;We&nbsp;need&nbsp;to&nbsp;run&nbsp;functional&nbsp;and
>> > >
>> > > regression&nbsp;tests&nbsp;parallely&nbsp;and&nbsp;randomly&nbsp;to&nbsp;discover&nbsp;more&nbsp;problems.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Dataroaring.
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to