Thinks for greate suggestions.

The print result function is missing, and can run parallely 
and randomly.
But it is easy to implement, I can support in next pull request.




------------------ ???????? ------------------
??????: "1 0"<dataroar...@gmail.com&gt;; 
????????: 2022??2??19??(??????) ????4:30
??????: "dev"<dev@doris.apache.org&gt;; 
????: Re: The new scalable regression testing framework(#8125)



It&#39;s&nbsp;a&nbsp;great&nbsp;job.&nbsp;I&nbsp;have&nbsp;a&nbsp;suggestion&nbsp;on&nbsp;writing&nbsp;a&nbsp;case&nbsp;more&nbsp;easily.&nbsp;&nbsp;We
should&nbsp;accept&nbsp;cases&nbsp;in&nbsp;sql&nbsp;and&nbsp;check&nbsp;the&nbsp;result&nbsp;by&nbsp;comparing&nbsp;the&nbsp;content&nbsp;of
stdout&nbsp;and&nbsp;stderr.&nbsp;This&nbsp;way,&nbsp;anyone&nbsp;can&nbsp;contribute&nbsp;a&nbsp;case&nbsp;easily,&nbsp;for
example&nbsp;I&nbsp;just&nbsp;execute&nbsp;sql&nbsp;and&nbsp;put&nbsp;output.&nbsp;The&nbsp;cases&nbsp;can&nbsp;also&nbsp;be&nbsp;used
easily&nbsp;by&nbsp;other&nbsp;tests&nbsp;like&nbsp;fuzzy.

Can&nbsp;the&nbsp;framework&nbsp;run&nbsp;parallely&nbsp;and&nbsp;randomly?&nbsp;We&nbsp;need&nbsp;to&nbsp;run&nbsp;functional&nbsp;and
regression&nbsp;tests&nbsp;parallely&nbsp;and&nbsp;randomly&nbsp;to&nbsp;discover&nbsp;more&nbsp;problems.

Thanks,
Dataroaring.

Reply via email to