I have rearranged the list in the following way - for those with their own specific schema, the name and namespace entries correspond to the feature's name and namespace, respectively. - for those with no specific schema, the name and namespace entries show simply bean and spring/blueprint in italic. And it is explained at the bottom of the table what this means - the entries are sorted by the name for the named entries first, followed by those no-name entries ordered by the simple name of their implementing classes.
2015-08-25 20:16 GMT+02:00 Aki Yoshida <[email protected]>: > Or maybe add an extra column to describe the common feature name for each > entry. > > > 2015-08-25 20:12 GMT+02:00 Aki Yoshida <[email protected]>: >> I noticed that the features described in the below features list page >> are not very consistently described for those bean based features. >> >> http://cxf.apache.org/docs/featureslist.html >> >> variant 1 (GZIPFeature, etc) >> Name Namespace ... >> bean ... >> >> variant 2 (StaxDataBindingFeature, etc) >> Name Namespace ... >> bean http://springframework.org >> >> variant 3 (StaxTransform, etc) >> Name Namespace .... >> Stax transform ... >> >> >> I think we should make those entries look consistent. >> >> My suggestion would be something like >> >> Name Namespace >> /bean/ ... >> >> where I /bean/ to represent "bean" written in italic and at the bottom >> of the table, we can give a short description of what those entries >> with /bean/ mean. >> >> I appreciate for your suggestions. Maybe someone has a nicer idea ;-) >> >> regards, aki
