Or maybe add an extra column to describe the common feature name for each entry.
2015-08-25 20:12 GMT+02:00 Aki Yoshida <[email protected]>: > I noticed that the features described in the below features list page > are not very consistently described for those bean based features. > > http://cxf.apache.org/docs/featureslist.html > > variant 1 (GZIPFeature, etc) > Name Namespace ... > bean ... > > variant 2 (StaxDataBindingFeature, etc) > Name Namespace ... > bean http://springframework.org > > variant 3 (StaxTransform, etc) > Name Namespace .... > Stax transform ... > > > I think we should make those entries look consistent. > > My suggestion would be something like > > Name Namespace > /bean/ ... > > where I /bean/ to represent "bean" written in italic and at the bottom > of the table, we can give a short description of what those entries > with /bean/ mean. > > I appreciate for your suggestions. Maybe someone has a nicer idea ;-) > > regards, aki
