I did some work on this since most of the stuff is just interfaces/annotations and that's fairly easy, and I can contribute my initial stab at this. I didn't JavaDoc it but that's something that can be added. If no one minds, I'll put it in the CXF sandbox.
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote: > On Thu February 11 2010 5:42:08 am Rick McGuire wrote: >> On 2/10/2010 4:07 PM, Bryant Luk wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > We (some followers to Wink dev mailing list) were wondering if the CXF >> > dev community would be interested in helping to contribute/consume a >> > JAX-RS 1.0/1.1 API JAR for Geronimo's spec jars that were Apache >> > licensed. I couldn't find an Apache licensed version of the JSR-311 >> > spec. I see other communities that have implemented JSR specs are >> > using Apache licensed of their specs. I don't know the exact >> > procedure to contribute a spec api jar to Geronimo, but I don't think >> > this would take too much effort considering that most of the JAX-RS >> > spec is annotation/interface based with very few actual classes. >> >> Creating a JAX-RS spec jar is definitely in our plans, but it just >> hasn't happened yet because we haven't started looking at integrating >> this support yet. We even have a Jira open for this particular task: >> >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5095 >> >> If you'd like to contribute code for this, the easiest way would be to >> attach a patch to that Jira issue. > > Either that or if people wanted to collaborate on it, create a directory in: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/sandbox/ > and work on it and then have the Geronimo folks move it to specs when its > "ready". > > The CXF sandbox is open to all Apache committers. The JAX-WS 2.2 spec jar > was initially created that way. Dims and I worked in the sandbox till it was > more or less ready. > > THAT said, for CXF on trunk and using Java 6, we've gone back to using the in- > jdk versions of stuff if at all possible. (which wouldn't apply to jax-rs > obviously) One reason is that the Sun stuff is much better javadoc'd and > we've had some developers complain about that when working in IDE's. To > switch from Sun's version, that is something that would need to be addressed > as well. > > Dan > > > >> >> Rick >> >> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Davanum Srinivas<dava...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Got it. i mis-remembered seeing a jax-rs api jar from geronimo. Looks >> >> like CXF uses the CDDL jar as well. May be we should ping them to see >> >> if they would be interested. >> >> >> >> +1 from me. >> >> >> >> -- dims >> >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo >> >> >> >> <nlgal...@us.ibm.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 from me Bryant. >> >>> >> >>> There isn't a JSR spec for JAX-RS available in Geronimo as of yet. I >> >>> don't know where they've come from in the past, but I'm assuming >> >>> they've been contributed by the relevant technical teams/communities. >> >>> >> >>> The API jar currently in the maven repo is CDDL licensed. >> >>> >> >>> -Nick >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Davanum Srinivas ---02/10/2010 02:40:56 PM---Why can't we use the JSR >> >>> spec from geronimo? :) >> >>> >> >>> Davanum Srinivas<dava...@gmail.com> >> >>> >> >>> 02/10/2010 02:40 PM >> >>> >> >>> Please respond to >> >>> wink-...@incubator.apache.org >> >>> >> >>> To >> >>> wink-...@incubator.apache.org >> >>> cc >> >>> >> >>> Subject >> >>> Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR >> >>> Why can't we use the JSR spec from geronimo? :) >> >>> >> >>> -- dims >> >>> >> >>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Bryant Luk<bryant....@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >>>> Hi, >> >>>> >> >>>> I see that several Apache projects based on JSR specs have geronimo >> >>>> (Apache licensed) versions of the spec. Should we also consider >> >>>> contributing one for JAX-RS 1.0 and 1.1? I don't see one in the Maven >> >>>> repository that's Apache licensed. >> >>>> >> >>>> Thanks. >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com > > -- > Daniel Kulp > dk...@apache.org > http://www.dankulp.com/blog >
