Eoghan, That's still not Apache licensed. It's just the Sun jar/code repackaged with OSGi stuff. The only thing Apache licensed in there is the new FactoryFinder.
If SMX is calling the resulting jars Apache licensed, that's a REAL concern. They aren't. Dan On Thu February 11 2010 8:47:59 am Eoghan Glynn wrote: > Have you considered just using the ServiceMix versions of the JSR-311 spec? > > Code here: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx4/specs/trunk/jsr311-api-1.0/ > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx4/specs/trunk/jsr311-api-1.1/ > > Artefacts here: > http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/servicemix/specs/org.apache.servic > emix.specs.jsr311-api-1.0/ > http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/servicemix/specs/org.apache.servi > cemix.specs.jsr311-api-1.1/ > > These are Apache licensed. > > Cheers, > Eoghan > > On 11 February 2010 10:42, Rick McGuire <rick...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 2/10/2010 4:07 PM, Bryant Luk wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> We (some followers to Wink dev mailing list) were wondering if the CXF > >> dev community would be interested in helping to contribute/consume a > >> JAX-RS 1.0/1.1 API JAR for Geronimo's spec jars that were Apache > >> licensed. I couldn't find an Apache licensed version of the JSR-311 > >> spec. I see other communities that have implemented JSR specs are > >> using Apache licensed of their specs. I don't know the exact > >> procedure to contribute a spec api jar to Geronimo, but I don't think > >> this would take too much effort considering that most of the JAX-RS > >> spec is annotation/interface based with very few actual classes. > > > > Creating a JAX-RS spec jar is definitely in our plans, but it just hasn't > > happened yet because we haven't started looking at integrating this > > support yet. We even have a Jira open for this particular task: > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5095 > > > > If you'd like to contribute code for this, the easiest way would be to > > attach a patch to that Jira issue. > > > > Rick > > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Davanum Srinivas<dava...@gmail.com> > > > >> wrote: > >>> Got it. i mis-remembered seeing a jax-rs api jar from geronimo. Looks > >>> like CXF uses the CDDL jar as well. May be we should ping them to see > >>> if they would be interested. > >>> > >>> +1 from me. > >>> > >>> -- dims > >>> > >>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo > >>> > >>> <nlgal...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > >>>> +1 from me Bryant. > >>>> > >>>> There isn't a JSR spec for JAX-RS available in Geronimo as of yet. I > >>>> don't know where they've come from in the past, but I'm assuming > >>>> they've been contributed by the relevant technical teams/communities. > >>>> > >>>> The API jar currently in the maven repo is CDDL licensed. > >>>> > >>>> -Nick > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Davanum Srinivas ---02/10/2010 02:40:56 PM---Why can't we use the JSR > >>>> spec from geronimo? :) > >>>> > >>>> Davanum Srinivas<dava...@gmail.com> > >>>> > >>>> 02/10/2010 02:40 PM > >>>> > >>>> Please respond to > >>>> wink-...@incubator.apache.org > >>>> > >>>> To > >>>> wink-...@incubator.apache.org > >>>> cc > >>>> > >>>> Subject > >>>> Re: Apache Licensed JAX-RS Spec API JAR > >>>> Why can't we use the JSR spec from geronimo? :) > >>>> > >>>> -- dims > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Bryant Luk<bryant....@gmail.com> > >>>> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> Hi, > >>>>> > >>>>> I see that several Apache projects based on JSR specs have geronimo > >>>>> (Apache licensed) versions of the spec. Should we also consider > >>>>> contributing one for JAX-RS 1.0 and 1.1? I don't see one in the > >>>>> Maven repository that's Apache licensed. > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks. > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org http://www.dankulp.com/blog
