That’s UTC time, I happen to know you are UTC+2 atm, so 17/18/19 for you (and 
me) :)

Best
Jan
—

> On 21. Jul 2022, at 17:56, Ronny Berndt <ro...@kioskkinder.com.INVALID> wrote:
> 
> In your browser, it should be your local time!? It shows me 15h, 16h and 17h… 
> Is this correct?
> 
> Best, Ronny
> 
>> Am 21.07.2022 um 17:54 schrieb Jan Lehnardt <j...@apache.org>:
>> 
>> Hi Deni,
>> 
>> I’m glad you’re on board. All times are UTC, apologies for the missing info!
>> 
>> Best
>> Jan
>> —
>> 
>> 
>>> On 21. Jul 2022, at 17:34, Denitsa Burroughs <denitsa.burrou...@gmail.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Jan,
>>> 
>>> That's a fantastic idea. Thank you for reviving the meet-ups. I hope we can
>>> establish a monthly cadence. Quick question: what TZ are the times in the
>>> poll listed in?
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Deni
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 12:24 PM Jan Lehnardt <j...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hello everybody,
>>>> 
>>>> In the past we’ve done two in-person developer summits with great success,
>>>> both from a team-building but also from a technical discussion point of
>>>> view. But these were ~1/2 a decade a part and took quite a bit to organise.
>>>> 
>>>> Given that meeting in-person continues to to be a pain and given that we
>>>> all learned how to do video calls in the past few years, I’d like to
>>>> propose a recurring synchronous meeting where we can discuss CouchDB’s
>>>> development in a different format than we do at the moment.
>>>> 
>>>> There are a number of high-level features that we’d need larger input on
>>>> but that are have enough moving parts that it would make sense to discuss
>>>> face to face (via video/audio chat).
>>>> 
>>>> In detail:
>>>> 
>>>> - we run a monthly video/audio meeting of ~90 minute length where we can
>>>> hash out CouchDB development topics
>>>> 
>>>> - in the beginning, I’d like to dedicate each meeting to a single topic,
>>>> just so we don’t get distracted too much (I have a short-list of proposals
>>>> for topics, but that’s for a later day, I’m sure we all do :), maybe a
>>>> topic needs multiple meetings, maybe we have time for two topics per
>>>> meeting, but let’s be clear and limited on the agenda, so everybody can
>>>> prepare with minimal effort
>>>> 
>>>> - each topic discussed will have a reasonably complete written proposal
>>>> that folks can read through in preparation
>>>> 
>>>> - if any one can’t make any particular meeting, no problem, there is no
>>>> mandatory attendance, and we are not making any project binding decisions
>>>> in those meetings
>>>> 
>>>> - ideally, we keep decent notes so that folks can catch up, and maybe we
>>>> can do a recording of it all for posterity
>>>> 
>>>> My suggestion would be that pick a date and time in the somewhat near
>>>> future and then stick to that date and time on a monthly basis.
>>>> 
>>>> Since it is (northern hemisphere) summer, it is possible that you, dear
>>>> reader, won’t be able to attend the inaugural edition, just select
>>>> something that works from the next iteration onwards.
>>>> 
>>>> I put up a date and time selection poll, it is aiming for late-EU and
>>>> early US-West compatibility since I expect that’s where most of the folks
>>>> are going to be: https://nuudel.digitalcourage.de/fUQFofPoezvvz9ev
>>>> 
>>>> I’m looking forward to seeing you all :)
>>>> 
>>>> Best
>>>> Jan
>>>> —
>> 
> 

Reply via email to