Skip is fixed, I think. A simple error when porting to the index/mrview shape.
Sent from my iPhone > On 8 Jul 2014, at 10:02, Robert Newson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes, it's been tested, though more is welcome. We know that skip for reduce > views is currently not quite right for clustered databases but is for single > node. > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On 8 Jul 2014, at 09:18, Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Robert Samuel Newson >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Documentation / API change notes are release-blocking but not >>> merge-blocking, imo. >> >> I remember this time where a patch was because it was big and not >> documented ;) Anyway my request was not about blocking the merge if we >> have no doc. I think it would be better to have it, and if it comes it >> would be awesome. But I also don't think it's blocking. >> >> The other thing I want to make sure is that the single node HTTP api >> (on the private port) continues to work even for views with the chttpd >> inclusing. Did anyone tested it? >> >> >> - benoit
