Yes, it's been tested, though more is welcome. We know that skip for reduce views is currently not quite right for clustered databases but is for single node.
Sent from my iPhone > On 8 Jul 2014, at 09:18, Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Robert Samuel Newson > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Documentation / API change notes are release-blocking but not >> merge-blocking, imo. > > I remember this time where a patch was because it was big and not > documented ;) Anyway my request was not about blocking the merge if we > have no doc. I think it would be better to have it, and if it comes it > would be awesome. But I also don't think it's blocking. > > The other thing I want to make sure is that the single node HTTP api > (on the private port) continues to work even for views with the chttpd > inclusing. Did anyone tested it? > > > - benoit
