Already done. Just forgot to close the ticket.
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 5:00 PM, kowsik <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 There's also this: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1265 (replication > introducing dups the _changes feed) Definitely would like that in > 1.2.0. > > K. > --- > http://blitz.io > @pcapr > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Filipe David Manana > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Completely agree it's time to start thinking about 1.2.0. >> >> There a few things I would like to see in 1.2.0: >> >> 1) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1238 (use _users >> database to store OAuth tokens) >> >> 2) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1266 (richer _active_tasks) >> >> 3) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1271 (replication >> cancelation fixes and simplification) >> >> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Sep 12, 2011, at 18:07 , Noah Slater wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On 12 Sep 2011, at 16:35, Jan Lehnardt wrote: >>>> >>>>> The fact that we branch 1.2.x won't mean we can't get more tickets in >>>>> there, it's just to unblock trunk for post-1.2.x commits. I hope this >>>>> makes sense and I hope you all agree. >>>> >>>> How are we going to stop a repeat of the 1.0 release branch "kitchen sink" >>>> problems? >>> >>> I'd like everybody to suggest their wish for 1.2.x and then agree with this >>> group on how much of the resulting list we can actually get into the branch >>> in a reasonable amount of time :) >>> >>> Cheers >>> Jan >>> -- >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Filipe David Manana, >> >> "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world. >> Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves. >> That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men." >> >
