On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sep 12, 2011, at 18:07 , Noah Slater wrote: > >> >> On 12 Sep 2011, at 16:35, Jan Lehnardt wrote: >> >>> The fact that we branch 1.2.x won't mean we can't get more tickets in >>> there, it's just to unblock trunk for post-1.2.x commits. I hope this makes >>> sense and I hope you all agree. >> >> How are we going to stop a repeat of the 1.0 release branch "kitchen sink" >> problems? > > I'd like everybody to suggest their wish for 1.2.x and then agree with this > group on how much of the resulting list we can actually get into the branch > in a reasonable amount of time :) > > Cheers > Jan > -- > >
I would like to put COUCHDB-431 in 1.2 , the last version is coming later today. (I'm currentlly testing it) I'm -1 for COUCHDB-1238. Since we are about to change the way we handle the users, I think it's better to wait for this one rather than introducing another big dependancy on this user db. Apart that , I'm ok for the trunk like it is. - benoît
