I agree with Andrew, fail loudly if we cannot find it.
And, jam all this into 1 attribute which may or may not have a version ( or
a tag? )
Essentially just store whatever the parameter to 'cordova plugin add' was.






@purplecabbage
risingj.com

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org> wrote:

> I don't think we'd want to try a fallback in this case. Better to fail
> loudly if the plugin can't be found where it's expected to be.
>
> I think since NPM uses only a single field (although theirs isn't labeled),
> we should do likewise. Don't feel strongly about it though.
>
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Edna Y Morales <eymor...@us.ibm.com>
> wrote:
>
> > It could make sense to store both for the case where restoring from src
> > fails. For example, if the path to a local folder no longer exists, what
> do
> > you use to restore? In that case you could use the version as a fallback?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Edna Morales
> >
> > [image: Inactive hide details for "Gorkem Ercan" ---03/30/2015 10:45:03
> > AM--- On 29 Mar 2015, at 23:11, Tim Barham wrote:]"Gorkem Ercan"
> > ---03/30/2015 10:45:03 AM---    On 29 Mar 2015, at 23:11, Tim Barham
> wrote:
> >
> > From: "Gorkem Ercan" <gorkem.er...@gmail.com>
> > To: "dev ‎[dev@cordova.apache.org]‎" <dev@cordova.apache.org>
> > Date: 03/30/2015 10:45 AM
> > Subject: Re: Question about plugin/platform --save: src vs version?
> > ------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 29 Mar 2015, at 23:11, Tim Barham wrote:
> >
> > > Hi - I'm looking for input on this issue: For the plugin/platform
> > > --save feature, there's currently an inconsistency between how we
> > > store the information in config.xml for platforms vs plugins.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > For platforms, we have a 'version' attribute where we store either the
> > > source location or the version: if the platform was added by
> > > specifying a specific location (git repository, local folder, package
> > > file etc), we store that in the 'version' attribute. Otherwise we
> > > store the actual version.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > For plugins, these two values are stored separately - source location
> > > in the 'src' attribute and version in the 'version' attribute. Note
> > > however that when we restore a plugin, we ignore the 'version'
> > > attribute if there is a 'src' attribute.
> > >
> > >
> > This comes from the history of the implementation ( as these things do).
> > In the old experimental save implementation, we had 3 parameters,
> > namely, version, url and installPath, and for every plugin we expected
> > one of them to exist. During the effort for npmizing the save
> > functionality the contribution for platforms and plugins were done
> > separately hence the unmatching attributes. So there is no real
> > technical reason for doing one way or the other and if you are willing
> > to unify them that is fantastic.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > I'd like to make these consistent. My first thought was to support
> > > 'version' and 'src' for platforms like we currently do for plugins.
> > > But since we always ignore the version if we have a src, I'm not sure
> > > we actually gain anything by doing that. Storing them in different
> > > attributes is perhaps clearer, but storing both implies we make use of
> > > both, which we don't. Also, the code ends up being simpler overall if
> > > we just store whichever we care about in the version attribute.
> > >
> >
> > I personally prefer to clearly label data in case user needs to
> > read/modify the config.xml, seeing a git url on the version attribute
> > still puzzles me. But I am fine with either way. Whatever you decide
> > please remember to support/migrate the current attributes so that we do
> > not end up with stale entries on config.xml
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Any thoughts either way?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Tim
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to