On 10/22/13 10:07 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <agri...@chromium.org> wrote: >Great feedback Josh! > >Are you looking for answers to these shortcomings?
Sadly, I don't think I know the answer to most of these. If people give me answers, I'll be happy to add them to the wiki. I suspect I can find review board... There's also a structural problem. I don't think that the "Process of Contributing" should really be in the same page as "IssueWorkflow". If people agree, I can split out IssueWorkflow eventuallyŠ Getting an apache.org account/doing the CLA stuff is something you'll do once. But touching issues is something you'll do many times. You shouldn't have to read the CLA boilerplate to re-view the workflow for working on issues. > If you're just looking for a +1 please improve the wiki, then... +1! I'll start nowise... --------------------------------------------------------------------- This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
