Great feedback Josh! Are you looking for answers to these shortcomings? If you're just looking for a +1 please improve the wiki, then... +1!
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Josh Soref <jso...@blackberry.com> wrote: > Google <https://www.google.ca/?q=cordova+issue+workflow> tells me that > there's a ContributorWorkflow: > http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/ContributorWorkflow > > But: > 1. Creating/finding an issue is buried in text in the middle of the "About > Commit Messages" -- that can't possibly be where one creates or finds a > bug in anyone's actual workflow. > 2. It doesn't say how/when issues are updated. > 3. It doesn't say if one should try to have an issue assigned if they're > working on it. > 4. "Review Board is a tool for committers to review each others' changes. > As a contributor generally you won't use Review Board - the pull request > should be sufficient." -- There's no link to review board. > 5. It doesn't explain the Version fields (found/fixed) -- neither who > should fill them out/according to whatŠ > 6. It doesn't explain how an issue should be resolved / what steps should > be taken. There seems to be a difference between something being "Fixed" > and something being "Resolved". > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential > information, privileged material (including material protected by the > solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public > information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended > recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, > please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from > your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this > transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful. > >
