Hum maybe I'm looking in the wrong place. I go to Groups and I only see one "cordova" https://reviews.apache.org/groups/ https://reviews.apache.org/groups/cordova/
I got to "My Account" seetings and I can only add one group "cordova" Which groups do you belong to or wish to watch? [] cordova Maybe the problem is that folks are not setting the "Group" field to "cordova" when they do a new Request? Could this be a required field when the repository starts with "cordova*" ? --Carlos On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Michal Mocny <mmo...@chromium.org> wrote: > reviews.apache.org is just a place to submit patches for review, manage > comments on lines of code etc. > > Some of us have started using it to organize reviews of patches. Its not > the most beautiful interface, but it serves its purpose. > > I just tried it and submitting a new review I see many more than three > items (heck, cordova itself has like 20 repositories now). > > We probably should mention it in the workflow, but its not a mandatory > item, just a tool for those who are interested. > > -Michal > > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Carlos Santana <csantan...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Thanks Andrew > > > > What's the deal with https://reviews.apache.org ? I found it empty > (i.e. 3 > > items) > > > > Is the Apache Cordova project migrating to it soon?, people don't know > > about it? > > > > If the Cordova Project wants to make it part fo the dev workflow it might > > help to document it on the Wiki > > http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/ContributorWorkflow > > > > I try using it and I failed, if someone can write a short cheat for it > that > > will be awesome. > > > > -Carlos > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org> > > wrote: > > > > > I got the site added to review.apache.org, so in the future we can use > > > that > > > for reviewing changes / new blog posts. > > > > > > I'll apply your patch tomorrow :). > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Carlos Santana <csantan...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I'm good for staging and review new features on GitHub Pages before > > > pushing > > > > live content to svn/infra > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Did I forgot to say I don't love SVN. > > > > > > > > > > Ya. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can we host this on gtihub pages and maintain the website on > > Github, > > > > and > > > > > > let github run jekyll on the source code? > > > > > > > > > > Unfortunately no. We could use Github for 'staging' I guess. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Downloads and Docs files will still be available from > > > > > > http://cordova.apache.org/downloads and > > > > http://cordova.apache.org/docsbut > > > > > > the website and blog will live in Github. > > > > > > > > > > Again, no. The website needs to be on Apache infra. =/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Carlos Santana > > > > <csantan...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Santana > > <csantan...@gmail.com> > > > -- Carlos Santana <csantan...@gmail.com>
