+1. On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Jesse MacFadyen <[email protected]>wrote:
> +1 to repack. > > Cheers, > Jesse > > Sent from my iPhone5 > > On 2013-02-12, at 9:36 AM, Brian LeRoux <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ah crap. Well, my thinking is just repackage it anyhow. (Not a world > ending bug tracking nightmare.) > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:40 PM, Tim Kim <[email protected]> wrote: > > Someone had brought it up through the google groups: > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/phonegap/wnICEdCs-Qk/discussion > > > > > > On 11 February 2013 15:24, Brian LeRoux <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Tim, has anyone reported this or are you the only one who has noticed? > >> (if the latter, I say we re-package, if the former we should probably > >> do a retag =( > >> > >> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:16 PM, Shazron <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Since it's a low risk change (version number only), I say re-tag, and > >>> re-package - who is in charge of the robson tool? File a bug against it > >>> > >>> Or is the version number not worth it? > >>> > >>> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Tim Kim <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hey gang, > >>>> > >>>> So it appears I forgot to push out a commit to update the version > number > >>>> in the BlackBerry repo, but accidently tagged 2.4.0 anyways. Should I > >> force > >>>> re-tag the repo? > >>>> > >>>> Also, the download on phonegap.com for the BlackBerry repo was kinda > >>>> messed > >>>> up anyways. In that the robson tool didn't copy over the www/ folder > and > >>>> just the bin/ folder (changed from using ant dist to ./bin/create). > >>>> > >>>> Sorry for the mix ups! I was at a conference and was kinda jet lagged > >> when > >>>> I was attempting to update the repo. > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Timothy Kim > > > > > > > > -- > > Timothy Kim >
