+1 to repack. Cheers, Jesse
Sent from my iPhone5 On 2013-02-12, at 9:36 AM, Brian LeRoux <[email protected]> wrote: Ah crap. Well, my thinking is just repackage it anyhow. (Not a world ending bug tracking nightmare.) On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:40 PM, Tim Kim <[email protected]> wrote: > Someone had brought it up through the google groups: > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/phonegap/wnICEdCs-Qk/discussion > > > On 11 February 2013 15:24, Brian LeRoux <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Tim, has anyone reported this or are you the only one who has noticed? >> (if the latter, I say we re-package, if the former we should probably >> do a retag =( >> >> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:16 PM, Shazron <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Since it's a low risk change (version number only), I say re-tag, and >>> re-package - who is in charge of the robson tool? File a bug against it >>> >>> Or is the version number not worth it? >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Tim Kim <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hey gang, >>>> >>>> So it appears I forgot to push out a commit to update the version number >>>> in the BlackBerry repo, but accidently tagged 2.4.0 anyways. Should I >> force >>>> re-tag the repo? >>>> >>>> Also, the download on phonegap.com for the BlackBerry repo was kinda >>>> messed >>>> up anyways. In that the robson tool didn't copy over the www/ folder and >>>> just the bin/ folder (changed from using ant dist to ./bin/create). >>>> >>>> Sorry for the mix ups! I was at a conference and was kinda jet lagged >> when >>>> I was attempting to update the repo. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Timothy Kim > > > > -- > Timothy Kim
