And BTW. I also welcome co-organisers especially those who have demonstrable experience with maintainer-focused AI - assisted efforrts
J. On Sat, Oct 3, 2026, 12:00 Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote: > Just one comment from vacations since devrooms deadline submission is > tomorrow. > > I believe (I only co-organised AI low level hacking devroom so far) - > FOSDEM organisers are usually accepting 'generic' devrooms - not tied with > particular organisations. So you might have a better chance of getting it > accepted if you do not frame it as ASF-only or ASF should not be mentioned > at all. This is the direction (and honest desire of mine) for the 'AI for > maintainers' devroom. I honestly want to listen to many people and > approaches they took on how AI can be used to help maintainers in their OSS > journey. > > So maybe a better idea is to rephrase it to something more generic like AI > use in OSS organisations in general. > > Just a thought that might help to frame it better. > > J. > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2026, 19:21 Andrew Musselman <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all, I saw Rich's thread about stands, and Jarek's note that he >> submitted a dev room proposal for "AI for maintainers." >> >> Anyone else submitting dev room ideas for the ASF? Another one I'll put >> in is "AI at the ASF," which would cover everything from Magpie and >> Sourcelume, to llm.apache.org, Gofannon, and Memory, the whole RAI >> package. >> >> By end of January we might have evals (Touchstone) and ASF-originated >> models (Frontier) to talk about, who knows. >> >> Best >> Andrew >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >>
