Am 23.02.22 um 13:37 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
On Feb 23, 2022, at 1:32 AM, Peter Kovacs <pe...@apache.org> wrote:
Imho the kids from today communicate more asynchroneus then the generation is
30+ is used to. (General speaking, not just the Open Source Group activist
point of view)
I'd be curious about how you think that... The generation 30+ *had* to
communicate async: they wrote letters, long-distance phone calls were
outrageously expensive (we else recalls waiting until the late evening to call
a friend in another state because that was when the rates were cheaper?), etc...
It is not about the availability. It is about frequency and preference.
If you have the choice between talking or using messaging. What is your
Preference? Mine is talking, even if I message to much.
I say young people decide using messaging over a direct talk at default.
A friend of mine is teacher, he complained once that his pupils don't
even use a dialog form. They just inform themself with log status
messages. Thanks to their helicopter parents (I hope you understand what
I mean).
Phillip: "I am at the scoolbus at 3"
Veronique: "I have the crackers."
Phillip: "I have the orange juice."
Maybe this is just Gossip. But I have asked a friend of mine why she
record a message after message with her best friend that was on the same
event.
She said that both can listen to the conversation when their times allow
it and the can focus on on other things. I hope you get the Idea.
I still state that a preference for synch communications screams privilege and
exclusivity.
I do not say that you are wrong. ;)
Cheers!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org
