On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 9:05 PM Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: > > This comes up frequently, and the end result of the discussion > generally is along the lines of: > at most, that data should be taken as an indicator suggesting when > deeper investigation is warranted. Even then, it should be something
Significant typo/thinko. The above should read "shoudn't be" > that should be a trigger for an investigation. It should be fishy > behavior that triggers an investigation. - Sam Ruby --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org
