Re-reading the earlier feedback and starting point, it sounds like: - the post was generally approved of, assuming comments were addressed - there's not an established process for this sort of thing - the PMC agreed to give me authoring access
So I will suggest that lazy consensus is good here. I will wait a bit longer, but would love to hit "publish" before the weekend. Kenn On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 1:54 PM Kenneth Knowles <k...@apache.org> wrote: > I made a bunch of perturbations and undid them and eventually the links > are working as-is... So anyhow this is good to review or publish if you are > happy with it. > > Kenn > > On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 1:35 PM Kenneth Knowles <k...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Thanks for the feedback! I've revised to take it into account. I'll try >> to reply inline to indicate how. >> >> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 1:02 AM Bertrand Delacretaz < >> bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 10:35 PM Kenneth Knowles <k...@apache.org> wrote: >>> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 8:51 AM Bertrand Delacretaz < >>> bdelacre...@apache.org> >>> > wrote: >>> > >... Feel free to draft your blog post and we can then review and >>> publish! >>> > I've drafted it.... >>> >>> Thank you, I reviewed [1] and it looks great to me! >>> >>> I have just 3 minor comments: >>> >>> -Add a link to the committer guidelines that you mention >>> >> >> The first sentence of the paragraph on that was a link. Something about >> my source is making most links not render. I got this one working, but many >> others are not. I'll figure that out... >> >> >>> -IIUC when you say "Every ~month" it means "about every month" - that >>> was not obvious to me initially >>> >> >> Changed to "about every month" >> >> >>> -for RTC and CTR you might link to >>> https://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html >> >> >> Done (but link is not yet working per above) >> >> >>> >>> -Bertrand >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 5:11 PM Craig Russell <apache....@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I realize that this message might be hard to read since copy/paste >>> formatting is gone. So here goes my attempt to clarify... >>> >>> On Jan 7, 2019, at 8:28 AM, Craig Russell <apache....@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Kenn, >>> >>> Thanks for contributing this. I think it's a nice introduction to Beam's >>> community building efforts. >>> >>> Here are a couple of comments: >>> >>> > We want our contributor-base (hence committer-base) to be more spread >>> across companies and backgrounds, for the usual Apache reasons. >>> >>> I'd elaborate instead of saying "for the usual Apache reasons". Which >>> reasons are important to Beam? >>> >> >> Done. >> >> >>> > (we have committers from community development, tech writing, >>> training, etc). >>> >>> I'd make this a sentence of its own. >>> >> >> Agree. Done. >> >> >> >>> > you shouldn't be proposing a committer for other reasons, >>> >>> I don't understand "for other reasons". >>> >>> > Every ~month, we call for new discussions and revisit ~all prior >>> discussions. >>> >>> I find the "~" to be distracting. Words please. >>> >> >> Done. >> >> > For a potential committer, we did this: >>> >>> It's not clear to me when a person becomes a potential committer. Is it >>> in the "repeat contributor" phase? >>> >>> > For an early contributor, >>> >>> Perhaps move this paragraph above the "For a potential committer" >>> paragraph? >>> >> >> Done. I think re-ordering and slight rephrase helped. >> >> > ~3~4 obvious committer candidates >> >> >>> As above, remove "~". >>> >> >> Done. "a few" >> >> > If we have no feedback about which guidelines were a concern, that is a >>> red flag that we are being driven by bias. >>> >>> I don't understand this. Lack of concern might be considered a "good >>> thing" not a red flag. >>> >> >> Rephrased: "Formulating this feedback is important for helping >> contributors to learn, but it also serves as a check against bias and >> politics. If we found ourselves unable to specify such feedback, that is a >> sign that we are deciding for a reason other than those we have declared >> and agreed upon." >> >> > as RMS says >>> >>> Who/what <https://teams.googleplex.com/u/what> is RMS? >>> >> >> Rephrased and spelled out his name. >> >> I'll keep trying to figure out what is going on with the links, and if >> you know the answer please share it! >> >> Kenn >> >> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Craig >>> >> On Jan 4, 2019, at 1:49 PM, Kenneth Knowles <k...@apache.org <mailto: >>> k...@apache.org>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Here it is: >>> >> >>> https://blogs.apache.org/roller-ui/authoring/preview/comdev/?previewEntry=an-approach-to-community-building >>> < >>> https://blogs.apache.org/roller-ui/authoring/preview/comdev/?previewEntry=an-approach-to-community-building >>> > >>> >> >>> >> Kenn >>> >> >>> >> On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 1:44 PM Griselda Cuevas >>> <g...@google.com.invalid> >>> >> wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> Where could we find it? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, 4 Jan 2019 at 13:35, Kenneth Knowles <k...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 8:51 AM Bertrand Delacretaz < >>> >>>> bdelacre...@apache.org> >>> >>>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>> >>>>> Feel free to draft your blog post and we can then review and >>> publish! >>> >>>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> I've drafted it. It is pretty long but still feels terse to me. >>> Feedback >>> >>>> very welcome on that point. I will try to find time to give it >>> another >>> >>>> pass, unless someone tells me that it is fine as-is. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Kenn >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> -Bertrand >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org >>> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> > >>> > Craig L Russell >>> > Secretary, Apache Software Foundation >>> > c...@apache.org <mailto:c...@apache.org> http://db.apache.org/jdo < >>> http://db.apache.org/jdo> >>> >>> Craig L Russell >>> Secretary, Apache Software Foundation >>> c...@apache.org <mailto:c...@apache.org> http://db.apache.org/jdo < >>> http://db.apache.org/jdo> >>> >>
