On 3/29/17 6:32 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 2:03 AM, Niclas Hedhman <nic...@hedhman.org> wrote: >> ...it speaks of "3 +1 and no vetoes"... Is it really >> "typical" that projects use vetoes for new committers?... > I like the "vetoes are only for code commits" rule that > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html defines, at least > implicitly. > > In the case of committer votes, I think a PMC must take objections > into account even if they are not considered formal vetoes.
+1 I see this as similar to releases. Technically, releases can move forward in the presence of -1's; but it rarely happens. Much better is to get to consensus on whatever is behind the -1 and agree to hold on the action or take steps to address the -1. Phil > > But that's a community management / health thing, not a formal mechanism IMO. > > -Bertrand > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org > > . > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org
