gargyi...@gmail.com On Mar 12, 2016 5:28 PM, "a...@nms.de" <a...@nms.de> wrote:
> HyperKitty looks really awesome. I am sure, that a lot of folks would love > to use it. +1 > If a broader consensus is found, INFRA should be included in this thread > here. > > Cheers > > Andy > > -- > Andy Wenk > Hamburg - Germany > RockIt! > > GPG public key: > https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x4F1D0C59BC90917D > > > > > > On 12 Mar 2016, at 10:15, Ian Dunlop <ianwdun...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hello > > > > I guess it would be possible to run hyperkitty alongside the current > > mailman ui so that those who want the old views can still get it. > > I don't think there should be an issue running gpl3 software on the > Apache > > infrastructure. It's just off the shelf software, shouldn't be a problem. > > > > Cheers > > > > Ian > > On 11 Mar 2016 22:17, "Christopher" <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> I'm not sure if it would work with our mailing lists, but if it does, > it'd > >> be really nice to run HyperKitty. It's a great front-end for mailman > lists, > >> allows linking directly to threads, searching, managing subscriptions, > >> navigating by dates and threads, finding people across lists, and even > >> participating from the website (with authentication). > >> > >> Fedora runs it in their infrastructure and I've really grown to love it > >> there (here's an example thread: > >> > >> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/ANCVPVCKSZBUPXH24DLH6ZK5KUPKCC37/ > >> ). > >> > >> It shames mail-archives.apache.org's mod_mbox, which is really showing > its > >> age lately. > >> > >> It's GPL3 (I know, I know, dislike and all the hate, but shouldn't be a > >> problem to just run it in our infrastructure, right? I'm sure our > >> infrastructure runs other GPL3 tools) and developed at > >> https://gitlab.com/mailman/hyperkitty and might be worth considering in > >> some future mailing list archive modernization effort. > >> > >> Anyway, just a thought. > >> > >
