Yeah, same question... Svn pushing or CMS still required? According to the snippet below the svn part is no longer needed....? But maybe I'm misinterpreting ...?
> On Aug 3, 2015, at 11:22 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org> wrote: > > This looks good. > > So do I understand any of the commiters editing the site would still > need to run Jekyll manually and push (how?), or is there a GitHub like > autobuild? > > Is Jekyll still requiring various Ruby libraries to be installed in a > carefully selected version (with fun time on Windows for native > dependencies), or is docker images like jekyll/jekyll making things > easier? > > > > >> On 3 August 2015 at 15:58, Owen O'Malley <omal...@apache.org> wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 11:56 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Several projects are using Jekyll to emulate the github style site >>> processing. As an example: http://drill.apache.org/ >>> >>> THis is still a bit inconvenient in that the gh-pages branch has to be >>> built using jekyll and then checked into SVN, but it does work pretty >>> easily. The process pretty much has to be manual because of the access >>> required to check things into SVN, but there is nothing else that requires >>> manual intervention. >> >> Actually, now infra has set it up so that you can have both in the same >> repository using the "asf-site" branch in git. Here is the generated html >> for ORC: https://github.com/apache/orc/tree/asf-site >> >> I really like the Jekyll engine for generating the HTML. ORC's jekyll >> source is at https://github.com/apache/orc/tree/master/site >> >> .. Owen > > > > -- > Stian Soiland-Reyes > Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating) > http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
