On 15/01/2015 11:33, "Bertrand Delacretaz" <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Rob Vesse <rve...@dotnetrdf.org> wrote: >... >> I think the LC50 is actually correct but could perhaps be phrased >>better... > >I've used your suggestion, thanks! Great > >> QU30: >> Agreed, some projects may not do anything that is attack prone... > >Added a footnote > >> ...Should there be a CS60 about the rare need for private discussions... > >I have added a mention of that in CS50 with a footnote, does that work >for you? Yes I think that is much nicer wording and I agree that it best belongs in a footnote Rob > >-Bertrand
