On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Rob Vesse <rve...@dotnetrdf.org> wrote: ... > I think the LC50 is actually correct but could perhaps be phrased better...
I've used your suggestion, thanks! > QU30: > Agreed, some projects may not do anything that is attack prone... Added a footnote > ...Should there be a CS60 about the rare need for private discussions... I have added a mention of that in CS50 with a footnote, does that work for you? -Bertrand
